Published: Sept. 19, 2014

Patty Limerick

Homer and Halliburton might be strange bedfellows, but thereā€™s one thing the bard of the ancient world and the multinational drilling giant have in common: both explore the mysterious world beneath our feet.

Patty Limerick, director of the Center of the American West, stopped by the CEJ on Thursday, September 18 to share her work with the Scripps Fellows. Limerick has spent the past few years creating an innovate approach to communication around the topic of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas, otherwise known as fracking.

Itā€™s been one of the most heated environmental debates of the last decade. And despite what most people may think, thereā€™s much more to the debate than meets the eye.

In her talk, called ā€œThe Fractured Underworld: The Thoughts of a Surface Dweller Drawn into the Depths,ā€ Limerick dug up the well-worn symbolism provided by ancients like Homer to describe the strangeness and fear we might feel when talking about dark places we cannot directly observe, like a drilling well or an aquifer.

She read from Fitzgeraldā€™s translation of the Odyssey, when Odysseus meets his mother in the underworld.

ā€œā€˜Child, / how could you cross alive into this gloom / at the worldā€™s end?ā€

Her work combines lessons from the humanitiesā€”including her ā€œcomradesā€ that ā€œreach across timeā€ like Homer, Virgil, and Danteā€”with a collaborative approach to engaging diverse communities about fracking.

As a historian, she said thereā€™s a lot her profession can offer.

ā€œOne of the core goals of the humanities is to explore the subsurface of public and private experience for the meaning that would otherwise be concealed.ā€

This has given Limerick a unique approach to unraveling the politically charged debate on fracking. Whereas many academics simply argue a need to ā€œeducate the public,ā€ Limerick said that this is merely superficial.

ā€œEverybody loves [education]. But itā€™s not as easy as talking at people until they raise a white flag.ā€

What works, she said, is digging beneath the surface dialogue and finding out what matters to people. Thatā€™s why over the last year, Limerickā€™s team at the Center of the American West and other collaborators put on a traveling speaker series to thoughtfully engage the public on some of the murkier aspects of fracking.

The series, called FrackingSENSE, brought speakers from all over the nationā€”and from even wider viewpointsā€”to a diverse set of towns like Ā鶹¹ŁĶų and Greeley. Speakers ranged from activists and industry insiders to politicians and academics.

Limerick said her role as a neutral referee helped add voices to the debate who otherwise wouldnā€™t have taken each other seriously. FrackingSENSE rebootsĢż.

Much of this divide over fracking, she said, can be traced to language. For example one group might call itself ā€œpro-industry,ā€ while labeling those who it perceives to be opponents as ā€œanti-industry.ā€

Limerickā€™s second project, lead principally by doctoral student and former journalist Adrianne Kroepsch, seeks to compile some of these dubious expressions and explain their implications in simple terms. This new tool can not only help ā€œcitizen-explorersā€ navigate the jargon of fracking, but it can also help journalists who are just breaking ground on the fracking issue. The project wasĢżĢżlast week.

Towards the end of her talk, and after an hour of making a group of serious journalists giggle, Limerick added that humor also plays an important role in communication. Critics of Limerick and her work complain that her approach is always too light or too lively. But Limerick said it means her communication is right on target.

ā€œThatā€™s a criticism we are happy to take.ā€